2010

For comprehensive coverage on E&Y, check out Francine McKenna’s blog, re: The Auditors.  Her latest post: The Case Against Ernst & Young: NY AG Cuomo Sues Over Lehman answers many questions and provides links to more detailed commentary.

The only thing I wanted to point out was that many articles point out that E&Y will most likely settle and likely avoid demise ala Arthur Andersen.  Check out Fortune/CNN’s article, Ernst and Young: Too big to fail, for more info on why the accounting industry, its clients, and regulators do not want to see the Big 4 reduced to the Big 3.

Below are more links related to the financial crisis of 2008 and the role of accountants.  Sign of things to come for the accounting industry?

Older links from March 2010 (Valukas report on Lehman bankruptcy leaked):

Newer links from December 2010 (Cuomo files civil-fraud suit):

{ 0 comments }

*Update 12/21 – Cuomo Sues Ernst & Young

Good or bad, it was on the front page of the Wall Street Journal yesterday.

Good news because fraudsters get what they deserve.  Sad news because the whistleblower still gets screwed while fraudsters find ways to cover up.

I was trying to write an article about the upcoming law suit to be filed by Andrew Cuomo against E&Y, but there’s just too much information out there.  I could spend all day reading about auditor lawsuits and/or incompetence.  So in the interest of writing something that people will actually read, I will simply link and provide some light commentary to how I reached my conclusion that E&Y is in trouble.

For those accounting majors with upcoming interviews for spring internships, this topic is something one should definitely consider before accepting an offer from E&Y.  Zero-Hedge blog is predicting the end of E&Y’s Financial Services group and possibly the firm as a whole (ala Arthur Andersen).

First, read the WSJ for a primer on the upcoming law suit.

Second, goto Zero Hedge for a breakdown of the Repo 105/Lehman/E&Y scandal.  This is a MUST READ.  It provides a quick summary on Repo 105 and the actions of E&Y’s lead partners.  Zero Hedge provides just enough info to back up its prediction that E&Y (either entire firm or just the Financial Services group) will go out like Arthur Andersen.

Then check out Reuters for highlights of a March 2010 letter sent by E&Y to other audit clients in defense of the Lehman examiner allegations and take note of the specific wordiness.  E&Y basically says that their audit didn’t find any material misstatement and that Lehman failed because of liquidity and not from accounting issues related to the $50 billion off balance sheet Repo 105′s.  E&Y says that the whistleblowers allegations would have been more significantly investigated for the 2008 audit, but Lehman went under before it got a chance.  Finally, E&Y says “Should any of the potential claims be pursued, we are confident we will prevail.”

Then check out Contrarian Pundit’s blog for an analysis of E&Y’s letter to clients in response to the Lehman audit.

Lastly, be sure to check out re: The Auditors blog.  Francine McKenna has been screaming out loud about the broken audit model for years.  She has written in detail about everything I have previously linked to above (probably even dated weeks/months/years before it was news).  Some of it is boring and long winded, but definitely worth checking out.

After spending a couple hours catching up on re: The Auditors, I gave up.  I love the blog, but it’s just too much of the same.  I agree with most of what she says, but it seems like nothing ever happens as far as laws and changes in industry practice.  The more I read, the sadder I get about becoming a CPA and having to deal with the moral hazard that is the backbone of auditing.

{ 2 comments }

Audits vs Examinations

by gaap toothed on November 19, 2010 · 0 comments

in AUD

I feel dumb for even posting this, but I finally figured out the difference between Audits and Examinations all thanks to my Yaeger videos.  Previously, I tried to memorize definitions because that’s how the Gleim book is written and just gave my best guess on practice questions.

After watching my Yaeger AUD Disk 1 (on 2.00x playback using VLC Player) I heard Gary mention that historically the terms “audit” and “examination” were used interchangeably, but within the last couple of years a standard/pronouncement/statement was issued that defined the terms.

I remember always struggling with Audits vs Examinations or Audit vs Attestation because the definitions in the standards are generally vague which makes it difficult to make a distinction among the terms.  Since Audits and Examinations were used interchangeably in the past, I now understand why my college Auditing course was so damn confusing.  I actually remember a few instances while reading my audit textbook where the textbook author forgot to update his book and used the terms interchangeably.

So without any further mention of my college auditing course, here is a quick, more technical summary:

AUD Notes for Wiley Module 1: Engagement Planning and Assessing Risk

Audits vs Examinations

Audits and Examinations used to be used interchangeably to describe the highest level of assurance.  The standards now specify that the terms are no longer the same.

  • Audits = an audit is an attestation service that deal with Historical Financial Statements and provide the highest level of assurance (aka Reasonable Assurance)
  • Examinations = an examination is an attestation service that deal with anything other than Historical financial statements (including non-financial data) and provide the highest level of assurance

Other related concepts:

GAAS vs Attestation Standards

Historical Financial Statements (ARC*) vs Anything Other than Historical Financial Statements (ERAup*)

Attestation Services vs Assurance Services vs Consulting Services

Attestation Services vs Non-attestation Services

Attest Function vs Assurance Function

*A-R-C = Audits-Reviews-Compilations

*E-R-Aup = Examinations-Reviews-Agreed Upon Procedures

I plan to update this later with detail on the related concepts and maybe some diagrams if I have time.

{ 0 comments }

Audit (take 2) Scheduled – November 30 @ 3am

by gaap toothed November 18, 2010 AUD

This is what I get for paying my Exam Fee Coupon 2 weeks before the testing window closes… My Audit retake is scheduled for November 30 at 3:00 AM.  And no that’s not a typo, it’s at 3 o’clock in the morning. While looking up openings, I called the Prometric center to double check that “3:00 [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Quick Update on lack of blog posts and updates

by gaap toothed November 8, 2010 CPA Exam

What have I been up to for the past 2 months? Short answer:  I stopped studying for these past 2 months and took a break to reconnect with friends and family that I had been ignoring. After my application to sit for the exam was approved in January 2010, I prohibited myself from going out [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

I failed AUD

by gaap toothed October 30, 2010 AUD

I got my AUD score today and as expected, I failed. I’ve been slacking off hardcore.  Moving this blog to my own domain name has been fun because it’s an easy distraction from studying.  Instead of writing blogposts about topics on the CPA exam, I’ve been coding. I knew the AUD exam was going to [...]

1 comment Read the full article →

Accounting Majors: Get Confident and Meet the Recruiters

by gaap toothed September 25, 2010 Featured

The following is an old forum post favorite of mine.  I like it because it’s a good confidence check.  Basically, don’t worry about your GPA.  A 4.0 GPA doesn’t guarantee you an interview, so don’t hide behind your perfect GPA.  A low GPA (2.5-2.9ish) is nothing to brag about, nor is it anything to worry [...]

0 comments Read the full article →